'Classical porticos'
and 'touches of eastern splendour':
the appearance of the Victorian Turkish bath

 

 

                  
This is a single frame, printer-friendly page taken from

one of the linked parts of an article published on Malcolm Shifrin's website

Victorian Turkish Baths: their origin, development, and gradual decline

        

Original illustrated page with notes and links

                           

 
                          

Adapted from a paper given at the
conference on
Victorian visions

held at Clare College, University of Cambridge
with The British Association of Victorian Studies
on Friday 1 October 2004

1: The Turkish bath as a procedure

This paper looks, briefly, at a few examples of how today’s view of the Victorian Turkish bath is being changed so that it already differs from how it was seen by the Victorians; at how the largely unfulfilled visions of those who reintroduced it to the British Isles are nowhere to be seen; and at how a new view of this fast-vanishing Victorian institution is being constructed.

People see a variety of different images when the words Victorian Turkish baths are uttered. It seems important, therefore, to start by indicating what is meant—and what the Victorians meant—by the term Turkish bath.

The Victorian Turkish bath, then, is a type of bath in which bathers spend time in a series of rooms, usually two or three, each one hotter than the previous one, until they sweat profusely. After a scrub and massage—together called shampooing—they gently relax with a coffee in the cooling-room.

In the British Isles today, most so-called Turkish baths are actually vapour baths, or Russian steam rooms. But the distinguishing feature of the Victorian Turkish bath is that the hot rooms are heated by air which is DRY.

2000 years ago, the Romans, and later the Ottoman Turks, used an underfloor hypocaust which heated the air in each room to a level dependent on its distance from the furnace. The hypocaust was also used in many early Victorian baths, while others used flues or pipes behind the walls, or a central radiator.

In a later development, a continuous stream of air was heated as it flowed around the furnace, before passing through each room in turn, cooling as it went. This method of heating the rooms is still considered the most satisfactory because the freshly heated air continuously replaces air which has become stale and sweat-laden.

The Turkish baths which remain open in the British Isles all use one or other of these methods to ensure that the hot air is dry.

So bathing in varying degrees of dry heat, followed by shampooing, and a final period of relaxation in a cooling-room, is what Victorian bathers understood by the phrase Turkish bath when used to describe a process, or set of procedures.

2: The Turkish bath as a facility

 

 
 

               
 

The original page includes thumbnail pictures which can be enlarged.
All the enlarged images, listed and linked below, can also be printed.

Air flow through the hot rooms

Central radiator at Alloa

Constantine's Convoluted Stove

cooling-room at Drumsheugh Baths Club, Edinburgh

cooling-room at GWR Medical Fund Turkish baths, Swindon

Hypocaust in the Roman baths at Bath

Plan of Erasmus Wilson's bath at Richmond Hill, showing underseat flues

Plan of the Turkish baths at the Old Kent Road Baths, London

Royal Turkish Baths, Harrogate: shampooing room

Shampooing at York Hall in the 1920s

Trier: tunnel to hypocaust

Two men in hot room at Glossop Road, Sheffield

Women's day in the hot room, York Hall, London, 1990

Top of the page
                       

 

All complete pages,
with images, footnotes,
glossary & bibliography,
can be reached from the

Printer-friendly single frame
versions of all text pages
(and from them, all images)
can be reached from the

You can bookmark this page

Home Page

You can print this page

Site Map

Victorian Turkish Baths: their origin, development, and gradual decline

Comments and queries are most welcome and can be sent to:

malcolm@victorianturkishbath.org

The right of Malcolm Shifrin to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him
in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988